Can the NVA be defined by Machining Methods?

Started by martin08, October 16, 2015, 10:39:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Loose}{Cannon

Hey....   A production facility capable of making an exact copy of every component on a Chinese sks could have been supplying China with all the parts.   dead1

rofl2
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

martin08

Next up, rear sling swivel (and a possible split in Star-1 stock numbering pattern).


The rear sling swivel bracket on both of my Star-1 guns show a single punch stamp to reinforce the collar loop to the base.







Now compare to a  Chinese letter and M21







The loop shapes are also different.  Star-1 pictured first, M21 pictured second.





A few interesting notes:

1.  Although I did not find the similar punch stamp and loop shape on any of my other side-swivel Chinese guns, I did find a rear sling swivel with the same pattern on my North Korean and a Sino-Banian with a retrofitted beech stock.

2.  The stock numbering font (width) changed between the two Star-1 stocks at some time between serial numbers 642551 and 63369.

3.  Are we having fun yet?    :)

martin08


Loose}{Cannon

QuoteI did find a rear sling swivel with the same pattern on my North Korean and a Sino-Banian with a retrofitted beech stock
.

Good...  Seems you have a chinese with a similar swivel.    thumb1


Pretty sure those are spot welds.......  The mark left kinda depends on how long the operator zaps it for, and of course when/where... Newb/veteran.


Next??
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

Worm


Loose}{Cannon

      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

martin08

#26
As requested, the Q/C stamps on the bottom of the receiver flats.  Also included the barrel/receiver assembly numbers.


Star-1, 643369






Star-1, 642551



martin08

Quote from: Loose}{Cannon on October 16, 2015, 02:12:34 PM
1958 3m Jianshe......    Next


So, now you're saying that my 64-prefix Star-1 is a '58 Jianshe???

8)

Yes, I did find the same style on a Sino-banian, too.  And the Type-63.  So were these made in Taiwan?

Loose}{Cannon

No..  But your nva could be 1958 chinaman.    rofl
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

Loose}{Cannon

Seriously...   Its a Chinese part that could have sat in a bin for x years. 
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

martin08

Stock finger relief cut.  Chinese Letter (top), Star-1 (bottom)

When did the size of the finger relief cut enlarge during the Chinese sequence?




Incidentally, the larger finger relief cut is also present on my M21 No's 8 and 9

Loose}{Cannon

Here's a pop quize...


What country sks used a 1-2 digit year dedignator at the beginning of the serial that numerically increased each year as the rest of the serial reset to #1?
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

Loose}{Cannon

      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

Loose}{Cannon

Everything your showing is some version of pre65 china.
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

CARBINE

#34
Quote from: Worm on October 16, 2015, 01:52:43 PM
*yaaaaaaawn*

Did I miss anything new while I was sleepin?

think1

Doesn't look like it.

rofl2

WOW! Long time no see, welcome back....
ââ,¬Å"If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldnââ,¬â,,¢t sit for a month.ââ,¬Â - Theodore Roosevelt


Loose}{Cannon

#35
Quote from: Loose}{Cannon on October 16, 2015, 02:38:44 PM
Ill take 1961 6m for $800 Alex...

Correction...  I believe the letterguns is where the long finger cut transition was..
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

Worm

Quote from: CARBINE on October 16, 2015, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: Worm on October 16, 2015, 01:52:43 PM
*yaaaaaaawn*

Did I miss anything new while I was sleepin?

think1

Doesn't look like it.

rofl2

WOW! Long time no see, sell me back....

Long time!  dance2

martin08

Quote from: Loose}{Cannon on October 16, 2015, 02:41:12 PM
Everything your showing is some version of pre65 china.

Yes, and I'm showing the parts construction/machining on only two 64-prefix Star-1 guns.  Wish we could have a few more Star-1 guns to give a better sample.  It could be that my two received parts lots from one Chinese lot, and other Star-1 guns received parts from other Chinese lots.

But maybe something is established.  If my guns have Chinese stocks, and the large finger relief cuts began during the letter series run, then the Star-1 guns are at least newer than 1959-60.

So, we are making progress.

Then to the two-digit year indicator followed by the incremental production serial numbers, which is entirely logical/accepted, do the features which appear on the Star-1 also follow the general parts availability which were present on 1960-1965 Chinese guns?

Yes?  No.  Not on any of mine from that 60-65 period (front stock ferrule, bolt carrier machining), but I have only a limited selection to compare.  And maybe?  Let's see if others can come up with pictures of the same stock ferrule (sharp) stamping, and stripper clip guide (steep) relief cut on the 6-9mil guns.  If these part machining practices are specifically found on 60-65 Chinese guns, then perhaps the Star-1 guns were being assembled at Jianshe right alongside the /26\ - and that's a healthy possibility.

But if the same machining practices are not found on 60-65, might the evidence point to a dedicated set of small part or finish machines, and/or parts finishing and assembly on a dedicated line which was separate from /26\?  And who knows where that finished assembly took place.  We do know that random-year blank Chinese receivers were getting stamped with the Star-1, and with a sequential rolling serial, wherever that final production facility existed.

Then the side-topic:  The font on the stock number.  I just noticed that today, so I'm not sure if the different fonts follow a solid break, and falling somewhere in between the two serials of my guns?   Suppose I should start looking at other Star-1 examples from around the web.

Loose}{Cannon

This would all be assuming the Chinese could not have scrubbed or recycled previous parts or even used random old stock parts... Remember your import marked IC 12m with Russian stock?

Assumptions will kill the truth.

Finding pre 60 parts on a nva in no way shape or form equals assembled somewhere else.
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

martin08

Agreed.  By using the phrase "assembled somewhere else", does that imply that we know where they were assembled in the first place?   :)

Anyway, good topic, and good discussion.

Now, let's find some pics of positively identifiable Chinese guns with the stock ferrule and stripper clip guide features.  I need that info!