Cast Receivers: Machined to Specifications After Casting?

Started by jmaurer, July 18, 2026, 03:09:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jmaurer

Some time ago, I made a guess that cast receivers appeared to have been machined to final form:
Quote from: jmaurer on December 11, 2023, 03:17:23 PMThanks for checking your files, Running-man! In scrolling through the photos again, something jumped out about the sides of the receiver where the barrel is pinned. It definitely looks as if the receiver was produced oversize and was intended to be machined to final specification; note photos 37 and 47 above:


On the normally round, most forward part of the receiver that houses the chamber end of the barrel, you can see small flats that appear to be the result of planing the receiver sides, where on conventionally-produced receivers, this area is essentially round, as far as I can tell with a quick review of a few random photos of other rifles.

Edit to add:Padams8888's 1972 DB Shenyang City rifle also has these flats; the images he posted clearly show machining marks spanning the main, largest flat side of the receiver and the forward-most round part of the receiver:
https://sks-files.com/index.php?topic=4345.msg48429#msg48429

However, his 1970 Arsenal 0221 rifle does NOT have these flats:
https://sks-files.com/index.php?topic=2270.msg26224#msg26224

In browsing recent auctions, I came across a couple of rifles that appear to have cast receivers, and unfortunately I only saved images from one of the auctions. What's intriguing about those rifles was the stamp that appears at the left rear of the receiver; a random internet Chinese character translation seems to indicate the following could mean "flat" or "planar", possibly supporting the notion that the receiver was machined after casting (if indeed the receiver was cast):



To determine if the rifle with the above stamped character was cast, please see the following two images:





Can anyone offer confirmation of my stab at translation of the character, or a better translation?
Alea iacta est

running-man

Interesting observation!  I'll look through my files and see if there are any others with that character. I can't say that I've noticed many before but that's not to say they aren't constantly there either.
      

jmaurer

It does look like the character for "type", but without a sixth stroke. I went crosseyed looking at several hundred pages of CJK Unified Ideographs for an exact match, but no luck yet. Hopefully another rifle will pop up with a somewhat clearer, more defined stamp.
Alea iacta est

running-man

#3
Yeah I found no translation for that character as stamped either.  It looks like there may be some light stamping to the right of it that I'm just not able to discern though.

Looking through my files, I find zero characters on any carbine (cast or otherwise) in that location.  I did confirm that [0221] is most definitely a cast receiver arsenal (at least from year 21 through year 25 and then continuing to the 70-300 prefix) as shown below:









      

Boris Badinov

Quote from: jmaurer on July 18, 2026, 03:09:56 PMCan anyone offer confirmation of my stab at translation of the character, or a better translation?


It looks like 式 "shi" to the left of the serial number.  If so it appears it has other meanings depending on the context -- among which are ceremony, ritual, and exemplar.


https://translate.google.com/details?sl=auto&tl=en&text=%E5%BC%8F&op=translate&hl=en


jmaurer

I thought pretty much the same, Boris. If the stamped character is shorthand for a combination word/set of characters, then the highlighted possible definition below could be applicable:



And sorry about the small image; I've got to search for how to post them in a more readily visible format...
Alea iacta est