The plot thickens...it appears as if the hole is supposed to have a pin going through it....right where the keystock would be. Is this even safe to fire I wonder?
I think we need to get to the bottom of this before you even think about firing this one Justin!!!!
With the bolt, magazine, and trigger in the gun, but receiver cover off, push the bolt forward as far as it will go into battery, then press down on the top of the bolt (this is what the bolt carrier does when it moves forward the last 1/2" or so). While still pressing down, try to pull the bolt back out of battery. If it moves more than 5 or 10 thousandths, then you've got a serious problem.
It doesn't move even a smidge. I looked through the pin hole and saw no bolt poking in the way either. It rests solid when pushed down on the metal directly in front of the interrupter. I cannot fathom what that 'missing' pin would actually be reinforcing. The only metal it would contact would be either side of the receiver, the bolt hammering into the metal both above and behind it, seems as if it would be pointless. Perhaps it is a window more so than a pin hole? Kind of like the windows on trigger groups? I could see the shadow of the edge of the bolt disappear completely flush with the top of the hole...as far as I can see anyway.
I took a peek at Yoopers and saw that indeed one of the examples of a cast receiver is a DB, but my serial predates it by either two years or 2 million guns...depending on what consensus is regarding these today.
I did also notice there is a T proof mark on the back of the bolt that I hadn't noticed, also...the serial is upside down compared to my other Chinese bolts too. It seems everywhere I look, I get distracted by one weird thing...only to discover another.
My wife is chiming in in the speculation department, wondering if these were only intended to be training rifles...using the low powered training ammo like we have seen from Europe. Has any training ammo from China ever surfaced? It would seem as if leftover parts and/or stuff that isn't up to spec would be fodder for cheap trainers. Considering nobody has ever nailed down any proof of the Bangladesh/Pakistan connection to previous speculation...and that the Chinese character translates to 'Brigade', while no reference to Type 56 is found on them, maybe they didn't cut the mustard to be official T56's...and were relegated to light duty? The threat of a cast
ANYTHING having a catastrophic failure in the field seems a bit risky.
Also, on considering the lack of the pins on mine vs. the cast example at Yoopers...it is also sporting a threaded barrel whereas this one is pinned...perhaps the pins were there to hold the barrel lug in place rather than relying on the threads potentially stripping under stress in the cast receiver vs. the hardened barrel material. With this being a pinned barrel, the weakness of threads mushrooming are bypassed. I don't know how much I trust a pin any more than threads...but, part of the fun is in the speculation until something starts making sense.
In the realm of it being a prototype, perhaps...but I would be more inclined to think it is more of a link in the evolution of how to cheaply and quickly make these, and maybe the progression towards pinned barrels? All I know is now I have another SKS I don't consider a shooter...at least the pristine Cherry's Yugo is something that I would feel safe firing.
But on that note, as filthy as this thing is the PO must have put an awful lot down the pipe, considering the gas system had obviously never been tampered with since its haphazard installation...but the barrel had been kept clean...the piston looked like the inside of a bong stem. I got it as clean as I could, but this is gonna require chemical intervention. However unsafe it may seem, she has taken a pounding since being stateside.