Author Topic: Ok... Lets light this candle.  (Read 14732 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Loose}{Cannon

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Sniper
  • *
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
  • Constitutional Extremist
Re: Ok... Lets light this candle.
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2015, 01:31:12 AM »
bump
      
1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms... It doesn't matter how many Lenins you get out on the street begging for them to be taken.

Offline armedhippie

  • SKS-FILES CONTRIBUTOR
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Marksman
  • *
  • Posts: 598
  • Love your family and keep your powder dry.
Re: Ok... Lets light this candle.
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2015, 06:09:17 PM »
This is taken from LC's original post (please refer to first post for details) with RM's template left blank for a quick copy/paste...

So, start a new thread, fill in the blanks, post relevant pics, we will all go over it, and then transfer it to the proper arsenal.

Please put the arsenal in the your thread title...

Barrel Lug:
Battle Sight on RSL:
Bayonet Type:
Bayonet Lug:
Bolt Carrier:
Gas Tube:
Gas Block:
Receiver Cover Takedown:
Rear Sight Block:
Serial Number Format:
S/N Components:
Stock Swivel:
Trigger Group Type:
Hippies are like stray cats...Feed 'em once and they never leave...then they stink up your couch.

Online running-man

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sniper
  • *
  • Posts: 6880
  • The only way to avoid Mosin #2 is avoid Mosin #1!
Re: Ok... Lets light this candle.
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2016, 11:01:01 PM »
/106\ is completed.  Not a whole lot of /106\ arsenal guns out there, and many have been retrofitted/scrubbed/etc. by Navy Arms for various commercial configurations.  I was able to find years 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 23.  There are likely year 22 and possibly 19 and 20 out there still.  doh1 

For some of the poorer quality entries with only a single photo, if anyone stumbles across anything better, I'll gladly swap them out. 

I think this will work out pretty nicely when it's all said and done.  thumb1
      

Online running-man

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sniper
  • *
  • Posts: 6880
  • The only way to avoid Mosin #2 is avoid Mosin #1!
Re: /326\
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2016, 10:36:05 AM »
Yeah those upside down west coasters I tell ya! :)

The different icons are kind of a quick visual for us:
(std icon) = No info entered yet.
(light bulb icon) = At least one of the known S/N prefixes entered, other known S/N prefixes not entered.
(thumbs up icon) = All of the known S/N prefixes entered.

And of course a thumbs up can become a lightbulb if we happen to run across a new S/N range (like what happened with that single 1.6 mil /26\ gun a while back)
      

Offline shotout

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Cadet
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Ok... Lets light this candle.
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2016, 03:24:40 PM »
I seen that there is a list of arsenal. Here are some stamps to add under each list. I do not know where else to put them for now. The arsenal 106 stamp is interesting.










Online running-man

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sniper
  • *
  • Posts: 6880
  • The only way to avoid Mosin #2 is avoid Mosin #1!
Re: Ok... Lets light this candle.
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2016, 04:54:29 PM »
I seen that there is a list of arsenal. Here are some stamps to add under each list. I do not know where else to put them for now. The arsenal 106 stamp is interesting.

Thanks for the photos shotout!  thumb1

We actually have all the arsenal stamps (or at least most of them) in photos.  /?5\, /106\ and /?8\ are all pretty common with many photos of stamps noted.  I have a set I'm using for the Chinese survey. I will be updating them when I move to survey 2.0 soon. The new set wiil look something like this:









Some of the photos i have are pretty poor resolution, however. I'll see if I can post what I have sonetine this weekend and everyone can see the ones I lack in addition to the marks that are poor resolution.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2016, 04:58:31 PM by running-man »