It's a good question to ask Alfred.
I honestly can't say with 100% certainty that the gun was made in China. It could conceivably have been totally fabricated in Russia with only Chinese observation or maybe no Chinese involvement at all.
Here's why I think not:
- The ghosts do not have the same acceptance stamps that a typical Russian of that 1956 vintage does. The acceptance stamps are notably different than what's seen on a Soviet-Sino.
- There is no indication of what Russian plant the guns were made at. All previous and subsequent Russian guns always had Tula or Izhevsk markings on some part of the gun. It just seems odd that Russians would change from marking to no markings back to markings. (Remember that the Soviet-Sinos had Tula star stamped receivers.)
- While there are ghost examples that are pre '94 imports. There are no ghosts that have ever turned up (that I know of) with Russian '91-'96 import stamps.
You could make an argument that the Russians contracted the ghosts specifically to deliver to China, and since they weren't making them for their own consumption, they didn't bother to mark the arsenal stamps, acceptance marks, or keep any of them for themselves. Unfortunately there is 0 proof that says any of these three points is true and these guns were made solely in Russia.
As far as being Chinese made, we have the Soviet-Sinos that came in with pre '94 Chinese shipments. We have a very narrow S/N range for when the ghosts transitioned to /26\ with no (as of yet) overlap. And finally we have a good inkling that the Russians continued to produce Tula marked receivers up to 1958, a full year after we think the ghosts transitioned to /26\ standings.
That's enough evidence to sway me, but who knows, we might find something in the future that causes us to need to revisit things and tweak the hypothesis. It's all part of collecting Cold War artifacts.