If the recoil spring don't change the way it acts, I would point my finger at the bullet ogive. A 230gr round is going to have a much more rounded plump ball shape than a 185gr or even a hollow point. The 230fmj rounds you tried, even being cheapie fun Tula, doesn't have an issue, feeding or extracting.
My Auto Ord. 1911 manual recommends the use of only 230gr fmj ammo, yeah, I cracked it open for the first time
on page 8, right between inertia firing pin and lead exposure. The feed ramp may be designed at such an angle, the less rounded bullets could possibly misfeed, the ramp may be designed around a standard 230 gr bullet fmj, a lighter bullet with a flat nose with slightly different approach angle may cause issues. I'm just guessing, why deviate from a pistol design that has seen and worked fine in WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East, each time using standard issue GI 230gr fmj ball rounds.
I'm guessing, the lighter, more pointed bullets will work, cycle, and what not, and I wonder what a 230gr HP would do, or maybe a lighter bullet more closely replicating the 230gr bullet profile. The lighter grain bullets might work fine in, say a Glock 21, because, your dealing with a whole different design, a more modern design than the 105 year old design. They had one flavor of .45acp bullet back in 1911, the 230gr fmj GI issue ball round, in 2016 there are hundreds, they haven't changed the feed design to keep up with the times.